Monday, August 3, 2015

Information Transmission Without Energy Exchange

           Information Transmission Without Energy Exchange: - BY Achim Kempf

Receiver when does certain amount of work out 'On and Off' , then according to Huygen's Principle , it is possible to receive Signal without Energy Exchange from Transmitter. This kind of Energy Exchange in Communication is called 'Quantum Collect Calling'. The space and time is Curvature in nature and the information gets linked between 'Transmitter and Receiver' through this Curvature in the mass-less Field . The same kind of communication is given by 'Casimir Interaction' . The information travels slower than the speed of light. Light is the 'Collection of Wave-Field' which gets exerted or Sailing by Waves –Curvature riding the dynamical Flow of 'Curvature'. So no 'Energy' is transmitted through 'Sender' to 'Receiver'.

It is introduced the following below method of 'Information Exchange between Transmitter and Reciever' :-
1)No emission or absorption of real quanta is necessary.
2)The information exchange need not be carried out by an Energy Flow.
3)Though it is massless nature of 'Curvature' , the Information Energy travels slower than Photon.

The Strong Huygens' Principle in QFT – The Green's Functions of the massless 'Klein-Gordon field in 3+1D Minkowski has strong support only for 'Light-Cone'. Any disturbances in the Minkowski space-Time propogates through this null-Geodesic Field Curvedly.

Time-like Signaling:-
Bob's excitation probability Pe(t) can be found into three contributions.
1)      Bob's excitation probability |αβ|2 due to his initial state.
2)      Bob's excitation probability R(t) due to noise.
3)      Signalling Contribution.


Bob's excitation probability three contribution equation as :-

Pe(t)= |αB|2 + R(t) + S(t).
The Noise caused probability R(t) for Bob's detector to be found excited has two sources:-
>One source of noise is the switching that couples Bob to the field .
>The second source of noise in R(t) is the Quantum Fluctuations of the field that Bob picks up once Bob is coupled to the field. R(t) is independent of Alice , i.e, it contains no dependence λA .

The Signalling contribution S(t) , determines how Bob's excitation probability is modulated by Alice's interaction with the field . Expanding S(t) ~ λA λBS2 +O(λ3) , its leading contribution is :-


.................... (1)

Notice that , in (1), the trace , i.e, the expectation of the commutator , is independent of the state of the field . Therefore , while 'S' is , off-course  dependent on the initial state of the field , its leading order contribution , 'S2' ,  is independent of the state of the field.

Note that for 'S2' to be the leading order contribution to S(t) , we require that neither of the detectors starts out in an Energy Eigen-State :

The Signal , carried by S(t) , competes with the Quantum Noise R(t) , and the question arises whether there is a threshold level of 'Noise' above which communication is no longer possible. We will now show that , within the perturbative regime , for any Noise Level , a finite Channel , can be achieved straight forwardly. Correspondingly , we will also show that Bob has a better than 50% success probability of guessing correctly an equal distributed random bit sent by Alice.


When Alice encodes '0' , Bob has a probability of either '1' or '0' due to the
If 'Alice' chooses to send '1' , then the probability of coupling increases and it is given bit as :-
½ +s(t).
Or  p , 1-p.
An Asymmetric Channel between 'Alice' and 'Bob' gives following 'Shannon Capacity' which couples the bits.

Crucially , the capacity is non-zero whenever Pq. Hence the Signaling Contribution S(t) is Non-Vanishing.It is clear technically that the finite capacity between 'Alice' and 'Bob' is never completely drowned by Noise .
The 'Channel Capacity' can be expanded as –
The small coupling expansion happens to Symmetric in  λA and λB.
Any increase of Bob's and Alice's  λ2A λ2B  Couplings increase the Capacity.
Signaling between Time-Like separated UDW detectors is possible whenever the strong Huygens' Principle does not hold if the commutator between two points does not vanish.
It is possible to couple two detectors around these points to the field such that (1) does not vanish and thus Signalling is possible.

Remarkably , the signaling contribution (1) does not contain an exchange of real energy carrying quanta . Indeed , Energy –Exchange processes(the sender's detector gets deexcited , emitting energy to the field , which later excites the receiver) have amplitudes of order O(λ,  ,λB) . Hence , they only contribute to Pe(t) at O(λ4).

Notice that , in 1+1 D where the commutator is constant , arbitrarily many spacelike separated receivers could be arranged in the future light-cone of Alice , such that all receive the same signaling contribution to Pe(t) . Since the receivers are spacelike separated , they can' t influence each-other. This shows that while the Signalling contribution to <HB> is caused by Alice , it can't be energetically sourced by her or it would violate energy conservation . We wild see that the energetic cost of the excitation of Bob's detector is balanced by the work required to switch the detector.

Conclusion –  The Navigation is the main researching while attempting  highest speed by Space-Craft. The Quantum Vacuum Fluctuation is the one possibility way of trans-receiving the Information. No Threshold of  Noise can shut down the trans-receiving process while the  Information carrier is Noise itself . The Trans-receiving Shannon-Capacity can never become zero , rather it always stands for giving value in Trans-receiving. If it is transmitted Quanta-Energy , then in 3+1D , it can never become succeeded  to receive Signal in Receiver because the Quanta becomes mis-tracked. Hopefully , if Quantum Vacuum Energy could be the way of navigating Space-Craft or any signal of Cosmos , then many breakthrough achievement can get for the humanity.    
Writer: Jayaram Bista  and Charlie Currie


























Saturday, August 1, 2015

Strings of Electrons In Different Number.


In all Electrons may not contain same kind of Strings . I have to tried to depict it through this model.
In Model , we can see 12 Dimensional Strings . These Strings in 1st row have highest Energy Level. In 1st row , the Energy level of String from right to left have increasing level of String. The second row has higher Energy Level The 3rd Row has lowest Energy Level. 
In repetative number of Strings , very least number of Strings are only repeatable but not so much in number because otherwise the complete arrangement of Energy Level and Configuration Level of Strings get changed. If so , Electron will not remain as Electron. 
According to Feynman Diagram , the Model seems controversial but according to Amplituhedron , the Model seems right . Once it checked detailed with LHC result , it can be said actually this Model is right or wrong .
Why I think that the Strings number may vary because Strings go under transformation . Further i will try to depict that shade in next page.

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Some Monalisa-Strings - the code of Multiverse Space-Time


These are the Strings of Multiverse Space-Time . Strings are Simpler to Complex in Composition. The Strings have both Dynamical and Potential Energy in it at the same time simultaneously.  Each Strings provides different Dynamical and Potential Energy . Each Strings provides different values to the Multiverse-Space-Time.











































Some Monalisa-Strings - the code of Multiverse Space-Time


These are the Strings of Multiverse Space-Time . Strings are Simpler to Complex in Composition. The Strings have both Dynamical and Potential Energy in it at the same time simultaneously.  Each Strings provides different Dynamical and Potential Energy . Each Strings provides different values to the Multiverse-Space-Time.





21-M-Fret

20-M-Fret

19-M-Fret

18-M-Fret


17-M-Fret


16-M-Fret

15-M-Fret

14-M-Fret

13-M-Fret

S Fret

12-M-Fret

11-M-Fret

King-Cobra String

10-M-Fret

Heart Fret 

9-M-Fret

8-M-Fret

7-M-Fret

6-M-Fret


5-M-Fret

4-M-Fret 

3-M-Fret


2-M-Fret

1-M-Fret 


Sleeping Fret

Reiki-Fret 

U-down Fret

Oval-fret

Closed-Fret

Mouth-Fret(Top View)

Mouth-fret(Bottom-View)

D-freet

Linear String 

Pointed String 

Concave and Convex String

2-O-freet